Options For Chapter 13 Debtors Who Cannot Make Re-Payments

Chapter 13 debtors who cannot make their required re-payments have options to assist them from becoming delinquent. The purpose of a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy is the re-organization of debts and assets and the judicial institution of a re-payment plan to allow a debtor to remain in possession of his or her assets. Since under Chapter 13, a debtor has the opportunity to potentially keep their property and/or assets it is an attractive option for many people facing debts that they have been delinquent in paying. Unfortunately, filing a Chapter 13 Bankruptcy petition may not be feasible for everyone facing substantial debts that he or she cannot pay. The Bankruptcy Court will not allow a debtor to proceed with a Chapter 13 petition unless the debtor can provide sufficient proof to the bankruptcy trustee that he or she is earning enough of an income to cover the court's mandatory monthly re-payment amounts. If a married couple reside together, both partners have to include their income and expenses on the Chapter 13 petition, despite who actually filed the petition. Further, any other individuals who live in the same household must also include his or her income and expenses on the petition. In the event that the debtor does not have enough household income to make the monthly payments to the trustee, the trustee may allow a non-household person, such as a relative or close friend, to make income contributions to assist the debtor in making his or her required monthly payments. Typically, a trustee will require that the person who is making income contributions to the debtor sign a legal document stating his or her intent to contribute a certain amount or a certain duration of time. Additionally, the individual who is making contributions will most likely have to submit proof of his or her earnings. If you are facing or considering bankruptcy the options and obligations can become confusing very quickly. Rather than making a life-changing decision without understanding your choices, you should consult with an experienced Bankruptcy attorney to gain more information or assistance with your individual situations. For more information about Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, debt relief, consumer debt, foreclosure or other bankruptcy matters in New Jersey visit TheNJBankruptcyAttorney.com. This blog is for informational purposes and in no way intended to replace the advice of an attorney.

Cram Down Or Strip Off Options For Those Beneath The Water Line in NJ

By filing for Chapter 13 bankruptcy there may be some relief to those who face this situation in the form of a process called a "cram down" or "strip off." Ultimately, these options may provide a debtor with the chance to reduce or eliminate the payments that he or she owes on their secured mortgages and eliminate liens on their homes. In today's economic climate, an increasing number of homeowners are facing the grim realization of foreclosure. For most people this is an extremely upsetting circumstance, but there are options to help people keep their homes in the face of foreclosure. A "cram down" is a process where the court may reduce certain secured debts to the market value of the collateral that secures that debt and thus reduces the amount that a debtor must repay. This sounds complicated, but consider the following example for clarification. A person buys a brand new car for $30,000, by taking out a loan for $45,000 (which includes interest) to be paid back through specified monthly repayments. After a few years, this person files for Chapter 13 bankruptcy, and still owes $30,000 for the car even though the fair market value of the car has declined to $18,000. Under a Chapter 13 repayment plan, the court could “cram down” the loan to $18,000 thus reducing the amount that the debtor has to pay back each month, thus allowing the debtor to more easily make mortgage payments for his or her home. A “cram down” is typically only available for certain secured debts such cars, furniture, jewelry, computer, and rental homes (not primary residential homes). Sometimes the mortgage balance that people owe on their residence exceeds the current market value of that home. If this is the case, it is said that the home is “under water.” Under Chapter 13, a "strip off" may be an option to modify mortgage repayment amounts by “stripping off” or discharging the balances owed on second and third mortgages and reducing the homeowner’s overall mortgage balance. To accomplish this, a court may reclassify junior mortgages from a secured debt to an unsecured debt thus allowing these debts to be completely discharged or dramatically reduced. This results in an overall reduction in the mortgage balance that needs to be repaid which could, in turn, determine whether a homeowner can keep his or her home despite the threat of foreclosure. If you are facing bankruptcy and have investments or other property to which you believe a strip off or cram down may be applicable, you should consult an experienced attorney to protect your rights. For more information regarding cram downs, strip offs, debt reduction, foreclosure or other matters relating to Bankruptcy in New Jersey visit TheNJBankruptcyAttorney. This blog is for informational purposes only and not intended to replace the advice of an attorney.

Abandonment of Property By Bankruptcy Trustee

A Bankruptcy Trustee moved to sell the property of a debtor and the debtor cross-moved to compel abandonment of the property based on the debtor's reported transfer to another. Under Section 11 U.S.C. 554(b) of the Bankruptcy Code, the court may, upon request of an interested party and notice of hearing, "order the Trustee to abandon any property of the estate that is burdensome to the estate or that is of inconsequential value and benefit." The burden is on the party seeking to compel abandonment to show the property meets the criteria for abandonment. If the burden is met, then the burden shifts to the Trustee to show that the property is of value and can be utilized to satisfy a debt of the bankruptcy estate. The debtors in the matter of In re Taggart sought abandonment on the grounds that the real property was not part of the bankruptcy estate according to Bankruptcy Code Section 541(d) and that, if the real property is deemed to be property of the bankruptcy estate, a constructive trust should be imposed in favor of the disputed buyers. The debtor, Raymond Taggart, claimed the property was transferred to his brother and sister-in-law, Dennis and Kathleen Taggart, brother and sister-in-law of the debtor, prior to filing bankruptcy. Under the law, Raymond Taggart was without rights to transfer the property without assent of the mortgage holder. The Taggart's second argument was that a constructive trust in favor of the alleged buyers, Dennis and Kathleen should be imposed post-petition. Under Section 544(a) the trustee has power to avoid any transfer by the debtor or any voidable obligation incurred by the debtor. The Taggarts could not provide evidence they were bona fide purchasers for value and had not recorded any deed transfer. At best there was an agreement of sorts between brothers and perhaps there was intent to transfer the property to Dennis upon payment in full of the mortgage. Even if transfer to Dennis upon full payment was the intent, Dennis and Kathleen could have taken steps to obtain their own mortgage on the property in order to pay off the mortgage taken by Raymond. As long as Dennis and Kathleen could not obtain a mortgage, Raymond was not unjustly enriched by their payment of the carrying costs because it could be considered rent. For the foregoing reasons, the court finds that there was no basis to impose a constructive trust and the trustee was not required to abandon the property but rather could sell it for the benefit of the unsecured creditors. The manner in which property is titled and used by the debtor can affect the treatment of such property in the event the debtor files for bankruptcy. Knowing how your assets are likely to be treated in bankruptcy often makes a critical difference in the decision of whether to file. If you are considering bankruptcy you should consult with an experienced bankruptcy attorney immediately in order to protect your rights. For more information regarding foreclosure, bankruptcy or other consumer debt matters in New Jersey visit TheNJBankruptcyAttorney.com. This blog is for information purposes only and in no way is intended to replace the advice of an attorney regarding your specific matter. Our law firm is a debt relief agency and helps people file for bankruptcy relief.

Chapter 13 Cram Down and Your Residence

While a first mortgage on a primary home cannot be "crammed down," if you have a second and third mortgage a Chapter 13 bankruptcy may allow you, the homeowner, to wipe out or strip the second and third mortgages. If you are like your fellow New Jersey neighbors you may owe more on your home than your home is now worth, often referred to as being "under water" or "upside down". When the home is worth less than what is owed on the first mortgage, and you have a second and third mortgage then you may be eligible for this cram down or strip off option. The Chapter 13 "Reorganization" bankruptcy allows the homeowner to catch up on the arrears on their first mortgage over a three to five year plan thus avoiding a foreclosure. The amount owed on the second or third mortgage that is above the value of the home is classified as "unsecured debt" and is then grouped with your other unsecured debt, such as credit cards and medical bills, which is treated differently than your first mortgage under the bankruptcy laws. How much you will have to pay back on this unsecured debt will be determined during the bankruptcy procedure and then you will be required to pay back only the amount determined within the three to five years of the repayment period. Debtors must show they have the means to make the payments to be eligible for approval of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy. At a minimum, this will require employment providing a steady cash flow which may be applied to payment of outstanding debts while leaving enough for basic living expenses. If you owe more than you can pay and have a second or third mortgage, you should consult with an experienced New Jersey bankruptcy attorney immediately to protect your rights. For more information regarding bankruptcy, foreclosure, student loans or other consumer debt related matters in New Jersey visit TheNJBankruptcyAttorney.com This blog is for informational purposes only and is in no way intended to replace the advice of an attorney regarding your specific matter. Our law firm is a debt relief agency and helps people file for bankruptcy relief.

Options For Handling Credit Card Debt

Many New Jersey residents have accumulated credit card debt they can no longer afford. Whether using credit cards to make ends meet due to a temporary loss of a job, unexpected medical expenses, damages due to Hurricane Sandy or simply as a result of increased monthly expenses, if the minimum payments are not paid there are options. One one option is to speak directly to the credit card companies for a forbearance, which temporarily suspends your payments for up to a few months, or negotiate to lower the interest rate and fees or a debt settlement of a lower amount than what is owed. If the credit card debts are overwhelming or the credit card companies are unwilling to negotiate another option is to file for bankruptcy. Filing a Chapter 7 allows for the elimination of dischargeable debts so that your personal liability for that debt ends and creditors cannot seek further payment. Not all debts are dischargeable however. Filing a Chapter 13 where a reorganization plan is created allows for the elimination of dischargeable debts when payment is complete so that your personal responsibility for that debt ends upon discharge. Before filing bankruptcy, it is important to meet with experienced legal counsel to discuss whether creditors may challenge your bankruptcy petition. A creditor may challenge the discharge of the debt by filing an adversary proceeding in the bankruptcy court if they believe the debt was incurred due to fraud, because the information provided for the credit application was not incorrect, the credit limit was exceeded purposefully, the credit cards were still being used close to the bankruptcy petition being filed, the types of purchases made were for luxury items, or cash advances taken, for which they have to prove in the court. Honest use of a credit card will be defendable against a challenge and permissible for discharge either under the Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 Bankruptcy. If you have outstanding credit card debts and want to discuss your options you should consult with an experienced bankruptcy attorney immediately in order to protect your rights. For more information regarding credit card debt, bankruptcy, foreclosure, or other consumer debt related matters in New Jersey visit TheNJBankruptcyAttorney.com. This blog is for informational purposes only and is in no way intended to replace the advice of an attorney regarding your specific matter. Our law firm is a debt relief agency and helps people file for bankruptcy relief. Contributed by Tracy Luciano

Reaffirmation Lets You Keep Your Car After Bankruptcy

If you have a vehicle and are filing for bankruptcy, you may want to reaffirm the lease/loan so that you can keep the vehicle. Many people hesitate on filing for bankruptcy because they do not know what will happen to their car which is their primary means of getting around. People who have continuing and steady income may have the ability to repay their debts when a repayment plan is established allowing them to retain their vehicle under a Chapter 13, referred to as a reorganization bankruptcy. When people file for Bankruptcy under Chapter 7, known as a liquidation bankruptcy, the "non-exempt" assets are liquidated and the proceeds used to pay their debts. Eligible debts which cannot be paid are then discharged. If the eligible debt is secured by a vehicle then upon discharge the creditor will get the vehicle back. The Debtor has the option however of reaffirming the lease or loan which then becomes a new contract, which cannot be withdrawn. Through reaffirmation, the debtor enters into a new contract with the creditor to make payments in exchange for retaining the vehicle. Assumption of a vehicle lease or loan may or may not be allowed by the bankruptcy court, especially if it is a lease or loan payment that is not affordable. Assumption may be beneficial under certain circumstances. If the payments on the vehicle are current and the interest rate and the monthly payments are low and affordable which may not be available if dealing with a new creditor right after a bankruptcy. If it is a lease and the purchase price of the vehicle at the end of the lease contract is reasonable then an assumption may be beneficial. However, you may be better off walking away from the unexpired lease and allowing the vehicle to be taken if the permissible amount of mileage was exceeded and you cannot afford to catch up on the missed payments. If you are thinking about filing bankruptcy you should consult with an experienced foreclosure attorney immediately in order to protect your rights. For more information regarding bankruptcy and reaffirming your vehicle loan or lease, foreclosure, or other consumer debt related matters in New Jersey visit TheNJBankruptcyAttorney.com. This blog is for informational purposes only and is in no way intended to replace the advice of an attorney regarding your specific matter. Our law firm is a debt relief agency and helps people file for bankruptcy relief.

Daughter Not Liable For Student Loan Taken By Father On Her Behalf

Creditor could not hold a former student liable for repayment of a student loan applied for by the former student's father (debtor) who was obligated under his Property Settlement Agreement at the time of his divorce to pay for her college expenses. Creditor produced loan documents which listed the former student as "borrower" and her father as a "co-signor" and which creditor claimed was executed by the former student. Creditor was successful in obtaining a judgment against the former student's father. The court however found the former student's testimony credible when she testified she had not signed the loan documents or had any knowledge of the loan. Her mother's testimony corroborated her testimony and her father was unable to identify the signature on the loan documents as that of his daughter and he claimed he did not know how the signature got on the documents. The court held that the father's testimony was not believable because he prepared the loan documents. The Appellate Court in its unpublished opinion of Educap Inc. v. Davis, upheld the lower court's opinion that the former student had neither expressly nor by implication agreed to repay the loan and though she benefited from the loan by being able to go to school it was the father's sole obligation to repay the student loan which he arranged for in compliance with his obligation under his divorce agreement. To hold the former student liable for her father's debt would be inequitable. If you are having problems with creditors due to student loan debt you should consult with an experienced consumer debt attorney immediately to protect your rights. For more information regarding student loans, bankruptcy, foreclosure, or other consumer debt related matters in New Jersey visit TheNJBankruptcyAttorney.com. This blog is for informational purposes only and is in no way intended to replace the advice of an attorney regarding your specific matter. Our law firm is a debt relief agency and helps people file for bankruptcy relief.